Claim 1:
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mazzola I, Cabral RJ, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Three-year survival of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations in people with disability. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):461-467.
Olegário IC, Hesse D, Mendes FM, Bonifácio CC, Raggio DP. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1761-1770.
Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Yalcin Cakir F, Ergin E. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities. J Dent. 2020 Mar;94:103175.
El-Bialy MR, Shaalan OO, El-Zohairy AA, El-Zoghby AF. Clinical evaluation of glass ionomer with glass hybrid technology versus conventional high-viscosity glass ionomer in class I cavities in patients with high caries risk: Randomized controlled trial. J Int Oral Health 2020;12:203-12.
Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):134-43.
Claim 3:
Esra FIRAT, Sevil GÜRGAN,Zeynep Bilge KÜTÜK, Filiz Yalçin ÇAKIR, Sema Seval ÖZTAS. 24-Month Clinical Performance Evaluation of A Current Glass-lonomer Restorative System. AÜ Dis Hek Fak Derg 2011; 38(2) 53-61.
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mulder J, Frencken JE. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Nov 25;33:e099.
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mazzola I, Cabral RJ, Mulder J, Frencken JE. Three-year survival of ART high-viscosity glass-ionomer and resin composite restorations in people with disability. Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Jan;22(1):461-467.
Olegário IC, Hesse D, Mendes FM, Bonifácio CC, Raggio DP. Glass carbomer and compomer for ART restorations: 3-year results of a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Apr;23(4):1761-1770.
Menezes-Silva R, Velasco SRM, Bastos RS, Molina G, Honório HM, Frencken JE, Navarro MFL. Randomized clinical trial of class II restoration in permanent teeth comparing ART with composite resin after 12 months. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Sep;23(9):3623-3635.
Esra Ergin, Sevil Gurgan, Zeynep Bilge Kutuk, Filiz Yalcin Cakir, Sema Seval Oztas. Guncel bir cam iyonomer restoratif sistemin 36-aylik klinik performansinin degerlendirilmesi. Cumhuriyet Dent J 2014;17(3):244-255.
Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Yalcin Cakir F, Ergin E. A randomized controlled 10 years follow up of a glass ionomer restorative material in class I and class II cavities. J Dent. 2020 Mar;94:103175.
Heck K, Frasheri I, Diegritz C, Manhart J, Hickel R, Fotiadou C. Six-year results of a randomized controlled clinical trial of two glass ionomer cements in class II cavities. J Dent. 2020 Jun;97:103333.
Gurgan S, Kutuk ZB, Ergin E, Oztas SS, Cakir FY. Four-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance of a glass ionomer restorative system. Oper Dent. 2015 Mar-Apr;40(2):134-43.
Claims 2, 4 - 7:
Clinical indication(s) / Claim(s)
Verbatim per manufacturer's Instructions-for-use (IFU) sheet
Claim 1: Class I restorations
Claim 2: Non-stress bearing Class II restorations
Claim 3: Stress bearing Class II restorations when isthmus is less than half of intercuspal distance
Claim 4: Intermediate restorative
Claim 5: Class V restorations
Claim 6: Root surface restorations
Claim 7: Core build up
.
Clinical evidence supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not supporting the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
Clinical evidence not related to the claim(s)
From full report(s) of prospective, clinical controlled trial(s)
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 1 / Total score = 1
Claim 1:
Molina GF, Faulks D, Mulder J, Frencken JE. High-viscosity glass-ionomer vs. composite resin restorations in persons with disability: Five-year follow-up of clinical trial. Braz Oral Res. 2019 Nov 25;33:e099.
Claim 3:
Kupietzky A, Atia Joachim D, Tal E, Moskovitz M. Long-term clinical performance of heat-cured high-viscosity glass ionomer class II restorations versus resin-based composites in primary molars: a randomized comparison trial. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Oct;20(5):451-456.
Akman H, Tosun G. Clinical evaluation of bulk-fill resins and glass ionomer restorative materials: A 1-year follow-up randomized clinical trial in children. Niger J Clin Pract. 2020 Apr;23(4):489-497.
Fotiadou C, Frasheri I, Reymus M, Diegritz C, Kessler A, Manhart J, Hickel R, Klinke T, Heck K. A 3-year controlled randomized clinical study on the performance of two glass-ionomer cements in Class II cavities of permanent teeth. Quintessence Int. 2019;50(8):592-602.
Claim 5:
Celik EU, Tunac AT, Yilmaz F. Three-year clinical evaluation of high-viscosity glass ionomer restorations in non-carious cervical lesions: a randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2019 Mar;23(3):1473-1480.
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 1 / Total score = 1
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 1 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 0 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
CQ-Score of the publication
Criterion I = 1 Criterion II = 0 Criterion III = 0 / Total score = 0
